Gibson Wins Trademark Case Against Paul Reed Smith
 |
| PRS Singlecut |
March 13, 2004
Gibson
Guitar Corp. in the United States District Court for the Middle District of
Tennessee has won a trademark infringement case against
manufacturer Paul Reed Smith. The claim involved Gibson's Les Paul single
cutaway guitar with a body design which Paul Reed Smith used without
permission or compensation to Gibson. This case declared that Paul Reed
Smith infringed Gibson's valid trademark.
Gibson Guitar claimed that the Paul Reed Smith "Singlecut" guitar infringed
on the company's trademark which is registered for its Les Paul single
cutaway guitar. Included in the claim is the fact that the Paul Reed Smith
model unjustly used the Les Paul design and would cause confusion in the
marketplace and damages to Gibson Guitar, the amount of which now will be
determined in the next phase of the proceedings.
Gibson Guitar has manufactured guitars and other musical instruments for
more than 100 years, and its premier product, the Les Paul guitar, has been
sold continuously since 1952. The Gibson Les Paul is named after the
successful recording artist of the same name, who has been the leading
proponent of the electric solidbody guitar since the early 1940s. Les Paul,
the artist, and Gibson Guitar hold a long standing relationship. Gibson
Guitar also sells lower-priced versions of its Les Paul guitar under the
brand name Epiphone.
Gibson's Les Paul single cutaway guitar is traditionally shaped with a
portion removed from the body of the guitar where the lower section of the
fingerboard meets the body of the guitar. The term "single cutaway guitar"
denotes that portion of the guitar between the neck and its lower part, that
appears to be missing from the natural, round body contour. The removal of
this portion forms what is often referred to as the "horn."
Gibson's application to the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to
register its "Guitar Body Design" in July 1987 was approved. In March 1999
Gibson filed a "Declaration of Use and Incontestability of a Mark" and the
USPTO approved that filing in September 1999.
Gibson claimed that Paul Reed Smith began production of its "single cutaway"
guitar called the PRS "Singlecut" in January 2000 in an effort to market a
guitar that looked just like the Gibson Les Paul.
Paul Reed Smith advanced multiple arguments as to why its guitar design did
not violate Gibson's registered trademark shape. None of the arguments
succeeded in convincing Federal District Court Judge William J. Haynes. In a
57-page decision Judge Haynes ruled "that PRS [Paul Reed Smith] was
imitating the Les Paul" and gave the parties ninety days "to complete any
discovery on damages or disgorgement of PRS's profits on the sales of its
offending singlecut guitar."
For more information, visit their web site at www.gibson.com. | 
